House panel approves local option sales tax proposal


Staff Report



FRANKFORT — A proposed constitutional amendment that could allow cities and counties to levy a local option sales and use tax for specific projects has cleared a House committee.

If passed by the House and Senate, House Bill 2 would let statewide voters decide this fall on a proposed constitutional amendment that would allow state lawmakers to give local governments the power to enact an up-to-1 percent tax for a specific local projects for a limited time, if the tax is approved in a local referendum. The tax would be discontinued once a project is paid off or a certain number of years has passed, whichever comes first, according to the legislation.

The proposal, sponsored by House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, and House Minority Floor Leader Jeff Hoover, R-Jamestown, cleared its first hurdle when it was approved today by the House Elections, Constitutional Amendments and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee.

“It’s actually a three-tier process,” Stumbo said of the steps taken to enact a local option sales and use tax. “The people of Kentucky would be given the option as a constitutional amendment and then if, in fact, it were to be passed as enabling legislation (by the General Assembly) then the city council or the governing body … would have to identify a project and vote to put that proposal before the people and then the people themselves would have to vote on it.”

Local option sales taxes are now allowed to be levied by at least one local government in 38 states including every state bordering Kentucky except Indiana, according to the Kentucky League of Cities. City and counties in Kentucky have never had local option sales tax authority under the current state constitution.

Stumbo compared the proposed legislation to the Kentucky Education Reform Act, or KERA, which increased funding for public education in the Commonwealth following its passage in 1990.

“If we say to Kentuckians, as we did 26 years ago with the KERA legislation, ‘we’re going to ask you to pay more, but we’re going to show you where it’s going,’ in that instance for education—in this instance they’d be able to see exactly what it’s going for, and I believe that’s the way in modern times that we have to approach these funding situation,” said Stumbo.

Legislation similar to HB 2 passed the House by a vote of 62-35 in 2015 but did not pass the Senate.

HB 2 now goes to the full House for consideration.

Staff Report

comments powered by Disqus